ADR Reading List: Tom Tyler, ‘The Quality of Dispute Resolution Procedures and Outcomes’

Our next item in the ADR Reading List is from Becky Batagol, who recommends Tom Tyler, ‘The Quality of Dispute Resolution Procedures and Outcomes: Measurement Problems and Possibilities’ (1989) 66 Denver University Law Review 419.

I really like this piece, despite its age, because it cuts through what is often presented when measuring the quality/success/effectiveness of a dispute resolution process. Tyler argues that agreement rates and participant satisfaction have a seductive quality but should be avoided as sole measures of process quality. I often recommend this to PhD students as a starting point for their research into a particular dispute resolution process and Tyler’s approach has been central to the design of some of my own research projects.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Jonathan Crowe. Bookmark the permalink.

About Jonathan Crowe

Jonathan Crowe is Professor of Law at Bond University. His research explores the philosophical relationship between law and ethics, looking at issues such as the nature and foundations of legal obligation and the role of ethics in legal reasoning.

One thought on “ADR Reading List: Tom Tyler, ‘The Quality of Dispute Resolution Procedures and Outcomes’

Post your comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s